When it comes to risk management certifications, two credentials stand out: the Financial Risk Manager (FRM®) from GARP and the Professional Risk Manager (PRM™) from PRMIA. Both certifications validate expertise in financial risk management, but they differ significantly in structure, recognition, cost, and career impact.
If you're considering a career in risk management or looking to formalize your expertise with a credential, this guide will help you understand the key differences and make an informed decision.
Quick Answer: FRM or PRM?
FRM is the stronger choice for most risk professionals. It has broader global recognition, a larger professional network (60,000+ vs ~10,000), more job postings requiring it specifically, and is considered the "gold standard" in risk management certification.
PRM may be suitable if: You need a lower-cost option, want flexible exam scheduling, prefer a self-paced approach, or work in a region where PRMIA has strong local presence. However, for maximum career impact and employer recognition, FRM is the recommended choice.
Overview of Both Certifications
About GARP (FRM)
The Global Association of Risk Professionals (GARP) was founded in 1996 and has grown to become the leading professional association for risk managers. GARP launched the FRM certification in 1997, and it has since become the most widely recognized risk management credential globally.
GARP is headquartered in the United States with regional offices worldwide. The organization focuses exclusively on risk management education and certification, hosting annual conferences and providing continuing education resources.
About PRMIA (PRM)
The Professional Risk Managers' International Association (PRMIA) was founded in 2002 by risk professionals seeking to establish standards for the profession. PRMIA launched the PRM certification as an alternative to FRM, with a focus on practical risk management application.
PRMIA operates as a non-profit organization with chapters in major financial centers. Beyond certification, PRMIA offers networking events, webinars, and professional development resources.
Exam Structure Comparison
The two certifications have very different exam structures, which affects preparation time, flexibility, and overall candidate experience.
| Aspect | FRM (GARP) | PRM (PRMIA) |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Exams | 2 Parts (Part I & Part II) | 4 Exams (I, II, III, IV) |
| Questions Per Exam | 100 per part | 20-30 per exam |
| Total Questions | 200 | ~100 |
| Exam Duration | 4 hours per part | 2 hours per exam |
| Total Exam Time | 8 hours | 8 hours |
| Question Format | Multiple choice only | Multiple choice only |
| Exam Windows | 3 times/year (May, Aug, Nov) | On-demand (year-round) |
| Testing Centers | Pearson VUE (global) | Pearson VUE (global) |
| Exam Sequence | Must pass Part I before Part II | Can take exams in any order |
| Same-Day Option | Yes (both parts same day possible) | Yes (multiple exams same day possible) |
FRM has a more rigid structure with fixed exam windows and sequential requirements. PRM offers more flexibility with year-round testing and the ability to take exams in any order. If scheduling flexibility is important to you, PRM has an advantage. If you prefer a structured timeline with clear deadlines, FRM may actually help you stay motivated.
Exam Scheduling Details
FRM Scheduling
- Fixed windows: May, August, and November each year
- Registration deadlines: Early, standard, and late registration periods with increasing fees
- Part II requirement: Must pass Part I first (can attempt same day)
- Results timing: 6-8 weeks after exam window
PRM Scheduling
- Continuous availability: Schedule any exam year-round
- No sequence requirement: Take exams in any order
- Shorter individual exams: More manageable 2-hour sessions
- Results timing: Typically within days
Curriculum & Content
Both certifications cover similar risk management topics, but with different emphasis and organization.
FRM Curriculum
FRM Part I (Foundations):
- Foundations of Risk Management (20%): Risk governance, ERM, CAPM, ethics
- Quantitative Analysis (20%): Probability, statistics, regression, time series, volatility
- Financial Markets and Products (30%): Fixed income, derivatives, FX, commodities
- Valuation and Risk Models (30%): VaR, expected shortfall, Greeks, binomial models
FRM Part II (Applied):
- Market Risk (20%): VaR methods, backtesting, stress testing, FRTB
- Credit Risk (20%): Default probability, credit derivatives, CVA, Basel IRB
- Operational Risk (20%): OpRisk frameworks, Basel, model risk, cyber risk
- Liquidity Risk (15%): LCR, NSFR, funding risk, treasury management
- Investment Risk (15%): Portfolio risk, hedge funds, performance attribution
- Current Issues (10%): Emerging risks, regulatory updates, industry trends
PRM Curriculum
PRM Exam I — Finance Theory, Financial Instruments, and Markets:
- Financial theory and asset pricing
- Fixed income securities
- Derivatives (options, futures, swaps)
- Foreign exchange markets
PRM Exam II — Mathematical Foundations of Risk Measurement:
- Probability theory and statistics
- Regression analysis
- Time series analysis
- Numerical methods and simulation
PRM Exam III — Risk Management Practices:
- Market risk measurement and management
- Credit risk management
- Operational risk
- Asset-liability management
- Risk governance and enterprise risk management
PRM Exam IV — Case Studies, Standards, Governance, and Best Practices:
- PRMIA Standards of Best Practice
- Case studies and practical applications
- Ethical conduct and governance
- Regulatory frameworks
Curriculum Comparison
| Topic Area | FRM Coverage | PRM Coverage |
|---|---|---|
| Quantitative Methods | Deep, integrated throughout | Concentrated in Exam II |
| Market Risk | Extensive (Part I & II) | Comprehensive (Exam III) |
| Credit Risk | Extensive (Part II) | Moderate (Exam III) |
| Operational Risk | Extensive (Part II) | Moderate (Exam III) |
| Basel Regulations | Very detailed | Foundational coverage |
| Current Issues | Dedicated section (10%) | Integrated throughout |
| Case Studies | Integrated in questions | Dedicated exam (Exam IV) |
| Ethics | Part of Foundations | Dedicated coverage (Exam IV) |
FRM curriculum is generally considered more comprehensive and rigorous, particularly in quantitative methods, Basel regulations, and credit risk. PRM's curriculum is solid but less detailed in some technical areas.
Difficulty & Pass Rates
Understanding the relative difficulty of each certification helps set expectations for preparation time and effort.
Note: PRMIA does not publicly publish official pass rates, so PRM figures are estimates based on candidate reports and industry sources. FRM pass rates are officially published by GARP.
Factors Affecting Difficulty
| Factor | FRM | PRM |
|---|---|---|
| Quantitative Rigor | Higher | Moderate |
| Exam Length | 4 hours (more stamina needed) | 2 hours (more manageable) |
| Questions per Sitting | 100 questions | 20-30 questions |
| Time per Question | 2.4 minutes | ~4 minutes |
| Study Hours (Total) | 300-400 hours | 200-300 hours |
| Candidate Pool | Highly competitive | Less competitive |
While PRM is generally considered less difficult than FRM, "easier" doesn't mean "easy." Both certifications require substantial preparation. The lower difficulty of PRM is also part of why it carries less weight with some employers—the rigor of FRM is part of what makes it valuable as a credential.
Cost Comparison
Cost is often a significant factor in certification decisions. Here's how FRM and PRM compare:
| Cost Component | FRM | PRM |
|---|---|---|
| Enrollment / Membership | $400 (one-time enrollment) | $195/year (membership required) |
| Exam Fees (Early) | $600 per part ($1,200 total) | $195-250 per exam (~$800-1,000 total) |
| Exam Fees (Standard) | $800 per part ($1,600 total) | Same as above |
| Study Materials (Official) | $250-350 | Included in exam fees |
| Third-Party Prep | $400-1,500 | $200-800 |
| Minimum Total | $1,600 | $1,000-1,200 |
| Realistic Total | $2,000-3,000 | $1,200-2,000 |
PRM is approximately 30-40% less expensive than FRM when accounting for all costs. If budget is a significant constraint, PRM offers a more affordable path to risk management certification.
Ongoing Costs
Both certifications require ongoing investment to maintain:
- FRM: $50 annual membership (optional but recommended); continuing education encouraged but not strictly required
- PRM: $195 annual membership (required to maintain certification); continuing education requirements
Employer Recognition
Perhaps the most important factor: how do employers view each certification?
Based on job posting analysis (January 2025), FRM is mentioned in approximately 10-12x more job listings than PRM. This significant disparity reflects FRM's dominant position as the industry standard.
Industry Perception
| Sector | FRM Recognition | PRM Recognition |
|---|---|---|
| Investment Banks | Very High | Low-Moderate |
| Commercial Banks | Very High | Moderate |
| Asset Management | High | Low-Moderate |
| Consulting (Big 4) | Very High | Moderate |
| Insurance | High | Moderate |
| Regulators | High | Moderate |
| Corporate Treasury | High | Moderate |
Geographic Considerations
- United States: FRM strongly preferred; PRM rarely specified
- United Kingdom: FRM dominant; PRM occasionally accepted
- Europe (Continental): FRM preferred; PRM has some presence
- Asia-Pacific: FRM highly recognized; PRM less common
- Middle East: FRM well-established; PRM growing
There is no major financial center where PRM recognition exceeds FRM. In most markets, FRM is the default expectation for risk management credentials.
Career Impact & Salary
How does each certification affect career progression and compensation?
Salary Impact
Due to FRM's higher recognition, FRM holders generally command higher salaries than PRM holders in comparable roles:
| Role Level | With FRM | With PRM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Risk Analyst | $80K-100K | $70K-90K | ~10-15% premium |
| Risk Manager | $110K-150K | $95K-130K | ~10-15% premium |
| Senior Risk Manager | $150K-200K | $130K-175K | ~10-15% premium |
Note: These are estimates based on market data. Actual salaries vary significantly based on location, employer, experience, and individual factors. The premium for FRM reflects both the credential's higher recognition and the self-selection of candidates (FRM's more difficult exam tends to attract stronger candidates).
Career Advancement
When it comes to career progression:
- FRM is increasingly required for senior risk roles at major financial institutions
- FRM is more likely to be specifically requested in job postings
- PRM may be accepted as equivalent in some organizations, but is rarely preferred
- Neither certification alone guarantees advancement—experience and skills matter most
Pros & Cons Summary
FRM Pros & Cons
- Gold standard recognition globally
- Larger professional network (60,000+)
- More job opportunities specifically requiring FRM
- Rigorous curriculum builds strong foundation
- Well-structured exam process
- Extensive third-party study resources
- Higher perceived value by employers
- Higher total cost (~$2,000-3,000)
- Fixed exam windows (3x/year)
- More difficult exams (lower pass rates)
- Must pass Part I before Part II
- Longer exam sessions (4 hours each)
- More study time required (300-400 hours)
PRM Pros & Cons
- Lower total cost (~$1,200-2,000)
- Flexible scheduling (year-round)
- Shorter individual exams (2 hours)
- Can take exams in any order
- Generally easier to pass
- Less study time required
- Official materials included in fees
- Lower employer recognition
- Smaller professional network (~10,000)
- Fewer jobs specifically require PRM
- Fewer third-party study resources
- Less rigorous curriculum perception
- Lower salary premium vs FRM
- Annual membership required
Which Should You Choose?
Based on our comprehensive analysis, here are our recommendations:
- You want maximum employer recognition and career impact
- You're targeting roles at major banks, asset managers, or consulting firms
- You want access to the largest network of risk professionals
- You prefer a structured exam timeline with clear deadlines
- You want the "gold standard" credential in risk management
- Budget is not a primary constraint
- You're willing to invest more time and effort for greater returns
- Budget is a significant constraint
- You need maximum scheduling flexibility
- You prefer shorter, more frequent exam sessions
- You work in a region where PRMIA has strong presence
- Your employer specifically values or sponsors PRM
- You want a risk certification faster with less study time
- You already have strong credentials and need a supplementary certification
For most risk professionals, FRM is the better investment. The higher cost and difficulty are offset by significantly greater employer recognition, career impact, and long-term value. FRM has established itself as the de facto standard for risk management certification, and choosing it maximizes your return on investment in both time and money. PRM is a viable alternative if specific circumstances make FRM impractical, but it should generally be considered a second choice rather than an equivalent option.
Can You Do Both?
Some professionals hold both FRM and PRM. However, this is relatively rare and usually unnecessary:
- The curricula overlap significantly, so you won't learn much new material
- Employers generally don't value having both over having FRM alone
- Your time would likely be better spent on other credentials (CFA, MBA) or skill development
If you can only choose one, choose FRM. If you already have PRM and want to strengthen your credentials, consider adding FRM rather than maintaining two similar certifications.
Frequently Asked Questions
Yes, PRM is recognized, but to a lesser degree than FRM. Some employers accept PRM as a valid risk management credential, but few specifically require or prefer it. In job postings that mention risk certifications, FRM appears approximately 10-12x more frequently than PRM.
Yes, you can pursue FRM even if you already hold PRM. There's no transfer of credits or exemptions—you would need to complete the full FRM program. However, your PRM study will have prepared you for many FRM topics, potentially reducing your study time.
PRM can still add value to your profile, especially if you have budget constraints or need maximum scheduling flexibility. It demonstrates commitment to professional development and risk management knowledge. However, if you're choosing between the two for long-term career benefit, FRM provides better ROI despite the higher cost.
FRM: Minimum 6-12 months (fastest possible: both parts in same sitting in May). Most candidates take 8-18 months. PRM: Can be completed in as little as 3-6 months due to flexible scheduling, though most candidates take 6-12 months. PRM's on-demand testing allows faster completion if you're highly motivated.
FRM is strongly preferred in consulting, particularly at Big 4 firms (Deloitte, PwC, EY, KPMG) and risk-focused boutiques. These firms often specifically list FRM as a preferred or required qualification for risk advisory roles. PRM may be accepted but is less commonly specified.
FRM: Does not expire once earned (though GARP encourages continuing education). PRM: Requires ongoing PRMIA membership to maintain the designation, with continuing professional development requirements. If you let PRMIA membership lapse, you lose the right to use the PRM designation.
Ready to Pursue the Gold Standard in Risk Management?
Start your FRM journey with our comprehensive practice questions